<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brian Linzy&#187; google Archives  &#8211; Brian Linzy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.brianlinzy.com/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.brianlinzy.com</link>
	<description>Si vis pacem, para bellum</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 02:07:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Flash</title>
		<link>http://blog.brianlinzy.com/2010/04/29/flash/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.brianlinzy.com/2010/04/29/flash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 19:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brianlinzy.com/?p=1652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve Jobs finally decided to explain why you don&#8217;t want Flash on your iPhone. Interesting timing, just after Andy Rubin (co-founder and former CEO of Danger, Inc. and Android, currently VP of Engineering at Google overseeing development of Android) sat down with the New York Times and said Flash is coming to Android in 2.2 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve Jobs finally decided to <a title="News from Apple" href="http://www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughts-on-flash/">explain </a>why you don&#8217;t want Flash on your iPhone. Interesting timing, just after Andy Rubin (co-founder and former CEO of Danger, Inc. and Android, currently VP of Engineering at Google overseeing development of Android) <a title="NYT" href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/27/googles-andy-rubin-on-everything-android/">sat down with the New York Times</a> and said Flash is coming to Android in 2.2 (Froyo). Jobs&#8217; six reasons made me wish George Carlin was still around to give this list the <a title="GC on the big 10" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YzEs2nj7iZM">Ten Commandments treatment</a>.</p>
<p>There aren&#8217;t six reasons on that list, there&#8217;s one: Steve doesn&#8217;t want people using <em>their </em>proprietary solution, he wants them to use <em>his </em>proprietary solution. This is a pissing contest, and iPhone users are getting pissed on.</p>
<p>Jobs says Adobe Flash is proprietary and Apple is &#8220;open&#8221; because they&#8217;re using HTML5, CSS and JavaScript. This is funny coming from one of the reigning kings of both closed source hardware and software. Somehow, faced with the exact same problem Google has worked out a solution. It turns out supporting HTML5 AND Flash are not mutually exclusive! Google loves &#8220;open,&#8221; but something had to give for the sake of user experience.</p>
<p>This is a power-play for the Apps market. Unbridled Flash support threatens to redirect money from Steve&#8217;s pocket. I don&#8217;t necessarily agree with Andy Rubin&#8217;s idea that people care about this whole &#8220;open&#8221; thing. I think it&#8217;s just the geek-set that cares, and in fact even just a subset of the geek-set. I tend to count myself among that group &#8211; until I really need to get something done with the tools I have right now. That&#8217;s why my Ubuntu laptop dual boots Windows XP, and why I keep a copy of Office 2003 installed, even though I mostly work in Open Office.</p>
<p>If the reliability, security, performance, and battery life problems Jobs points out are true, Flash is garbage. And I think they are true, and Flash is garbage. Either Adobe will fix them (they won&#8217;t) or Flash will die a natural death. But as he popints out, &#8220;75% of video on the web is in Flash.&#8221; What good is the <a title="Snapdragon" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snapdragon_(processor)">1 GHz Snapdragon</a> in my Nexus One if I can&#8217;t use it to surf the web as it exists today? Are people buying iPhones to use them today, or to surf the web in some mystical, open web of the future?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.brianlinzy.com/2010/04/29/flash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ordering the Nexus One</title>
		<link>http://blog.brianlinzy.com/2010/02/26/ordering-nexus/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.brianlinzy.com/2010/02/26/ordering-nexus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs & Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nexus One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ordering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brianlinzy.com/?p=1492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You only need to take a quick look at the simplicity of google.com or the elegance of the gmail inbox to know Google is pretty good at managing user experience. The engineers at Google eat their own dog food (although that backfired with the recent release of Buzz.) But I&#8217;m pretty sure nobody at Google [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You only need to take a quick look at the simplicity of <a title="The Goog" href="http://www.google.com">google.com</a> or the elegance of the <a href="http://mail.google.com">gmail inbox</a> to know Google is pretty good at managing user experience. The engineers at Google <a title="Dogfooding" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eating_one%27s_own_dog_food">eat their own dog food</a> (although that <a title="BBC Blog" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/maggieshiels/2010/02/google_buzz_scorecard.html" target="_blank">backfired</a> with the recent release of Buzz.)</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m pretty sure nobody at Google had to <a title="Nexus One" href="http://www.google.com/phone">order a Nexus One</a> through their site. Right now that&#8217;s the only way to get one. If you go to a T-Mo store or the T-Mo website they will pretend they&#8217;ve never heard of the Nexus One.</p>
<p>First of all I could only get the order form to work in Google&#8217;s own web browser, <a title="Chrome Browser" href="http://www.google.com/chrome" target="_blank">Chrome</a>.  I tried FireFox and IE from 3 different computers, 3 different networks, 2 different operating systems, on two days a week apart.</p>
<p>That alone is enough to label the ordering process a FAIL. But there were other issues. They didn&#8217;t seem to recognize Virginia as a state, even though I selected it from their dropdown box.  Maybe it&#8217;s because we&#8217;re a Commonwealth. That error blanked out a bunch of fields, so I ended up entering my SSN, driver license number, and a few other things several times before it decided Virginia was in fact a state.</p>
<p>After you complete that form and check out with Google Checkout&#8230; well, it&#8217;s not clear what happens after that. It says I&#8217;ve been accepted, but they mean they are able to port my number.  Why wouldn&#8217;t they be able to port my number? Doesn&#8217;t T-mobile do a credit check and approve or deny the account? It&#8217;s all unclear. There&#8217;s only one plan from T-Mobile, and they don&#8217;t tell you much about it.  Having completed the order form and agreeing to a couple of pages of Terms and Conditions, I&#8217;m done. I guess.</p>
<p>And this wasn&#8217;t just a one time thing &#8211; this was the process for all THREE Nexus Ones I ordered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.brianlinzy.com/2010/02/26/ordering-nexus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New Vanity Search</title>
		<link>http://blog.brianlinzy.com/2009/08/05/the-new-vanity-search/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.brianlinzy.com/2009/08/05/the-new-vanity-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 12:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs & Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vanity search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brianlinzy.com/?p=1041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought of another way to vanity search or check on someone&#8217;s popularity on the web.  Instead of just googling your name, start typing in the search box in Firefox or on google.com now that Suggest seems to be a standard feature. How many letters do you have to type before your name pops up? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought of another way to vanity search or check on someone&#8217;s popularity on the web.  Instead of just googling your name, start typing in the search box in Firefox or on <a title="The Goog" href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank">google.com</a> now that Suggest seems to be a standard feature.</p>
<p>How many letters do you have to type before your name pops up? In my case I have to type &#8220;Brian Linz&#8221; before I get, &#8220;Brian Linzy&#8221;.  Also, once your name appears how much of it do you have to type for it to come to the top of the suggestion list?  And finally, if you submit the search does it suggest another name, like &#8220;Did you mean: brian lindsay&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.brianlinzy.com/2009/08/05/the-new-vanity-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.627 seconds -->
